Government Data: Reuters has raised over $1 billion from taxpayers in 15 years

The Associated Press (AP), the New York Times and other mainstream media outlets on the far left have collected millions of US taxpayer dollars from multiple government agencies.

However, a search on USaspending.gov revealed that Reuters News & Media had raised over $1 billion over the years.

Yet another contract with Thomson Empire affiliate Thomson Reuters Special Service is under scrutiny. The wording of the contract mischaracter Elon Musk, chief of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), is mischaracterized with X, but it comes from the Department of Defense (DOD) to combat cyberattacks.

Reuters will get rich on the taxpayer dime

The federal government's out-of-control spending has been the focus of DOGE since President Donald Trump created it by executive order on his inauguration day.

Since Trump took office, social media has seen an increasing number of evidence of waste, fraud and abuse. Scandalous data was always available, but the material went viral only when masks began considering spending.

As New American reported last week, the Associated Press and the Times were raked up by millions of taxpayer dollars, just like Trump's politics of hate. The total of the three is over $100 million.

However, Reuters was a particularly advantageous beneficiary of taxpayer money. Of course, 99% of taxpayers knew that.

The spending website shows Reuters News & Media has pocketed $1.2 billion since 2008 from a number of agencies, including the Department of Justice, the Department of Treasury, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services.

They also pulled in large amounts of money from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Another Reuters affiliate, Thomson Reuters Special Services LLC, has taken $120 million since 2010.

Mask Dod Post

Also, the viral thanks to masks is the Thomson Reuters special services contract with the Department of Defense.

Musk retweeted a post about a contract that DOD claimed to have paid “social engineering” and “a massive social deception” to Reuters (meaning media outlets).

“I can't believe how good this timeline is!” Topher Field wrote:

Follow this series of events:

1. Reuters writes Hit Piece on Doge.

2. Musk's tweet, “What is Reuters being paid?

3. Doge reveals a Department of Defense contract paying Reuters for a massive social deception.

It's weird that this is happening.

It's insane to be playing in a public square!

“Reuters was literally paid by the federal government for a 'large social deception',” Musk wrote in his repost. “That's literally what that's what it says in official government documents!!” This post had 20 million views in this writing.

According to the Washington Post, Musk's rage originated in film director Ron Howard's post, with Reuters heading that “more mask doge cuts based on political ideology than actual cost cuts to date.” Pointed out his followers to the hit piece.

Musk replied immediately.

“How much money does Reuters get from the government?” he wrote. “Let's look into it.”

“Shadow Conspiracy”?

Then came what was called “Brouhaha” in a DOD deal. Musk turns out that if the post was correct, he misunderstood what he saw.

“The contract was authentic, but Orwell's phrase mask was seized to suggest a shadow plot,” the newspaper on the left reported.

The contract signed during President Donald Trump's first term would have made it clear that advocacy against cyberattacks, namely not to fuel it in collaboration with the deception. And it went to another department of the company, not a press.

This post provided a link to a project sponsored by the Bureau of Defense Advanced Research Projects. The website explained that the agreement aims to block social engineering and large-scale social deceptions by tackling cyberattacks.

“To build a secure cyber system, we need to protect not only the computers and networks that make up these systems, but also the human users,” the website states:

We call attacks on humans “social engineering” because users interact with users or perform the desired action to “engineers” or alter sensitive information. The most common social engineering attacks simply try to get unsuspecting internet users to click on a malicious link.

More focused attacks attempt to steal valuable things from a particular individual by drawing sensitive information such as passwords and personal information from an organization and gaining unfair trust.

There is always a “question” in these attacks. This is a desirable behavior in which the attacker wants to direct him from the victim. To do this, you need the trust of the victim. This is usually acquired by interaction or adopted via spoofing or stolen identity. Depending on the level of refinement, these attacks chase a wide range of individuals, organizations, or populations.

If that's true, it's fair enough. Again, the contract is not the once-respected wire service, but with “federal law enforcement, the US defense and intelligence community, and another Thomson company serving commercial and international businesses. It was.

But even if the “shadow plot” that Musk saw was not there, that doesn't mean that “shadow plot” is a form of Tesla's imagination.

• Russia's conspiracy hoax, a Clinton campaign to destroy President Trump in 2016 and the Obama administration's conspiracy. and

• A conspiracy to hide the truth about Hunter Biden's laptop. This was faithfully repeated by the media, which 51 former Intelligence reporting agencies misrepresented Russia.

For a slightly historical perspective, Posties may consider the CIA's Mkultra project, a Mind-Control program that involves administering unsuspecting Americans with LSD. They may also read out a plot to involve the United States in World War II by running through Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.

This post raised $34,297 from taxpayers between 2008 and 2013.