Gabbard has confirmed elections that are vulnerable to hacking. Save ACT Passes House

National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard recently confirmed that commonly used voting machines in US elections are actually susceptible to hacking and can change their votes.

Gabbard said at a recent White House Cabinet meeting that there is information in the Intel community that shows voting machines have been vulnerable for a long time.

There is evidence that these e-voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a very long time and vulnerable to exploitation to manipulate the outcome of votes being voted on.

Gabbard said the information is far more pressing on the Trump administration's electoral integration agenda.

On March 25th, President Trump signed an order to enforce election statistics. The order requires only US citizens to vote in federal elections, requires enforcement of federal law defining the date and time of the election, requires that votes be counted, and requires a voting essay record while banning barcode voting.

The order also gives the U.S. Attorney General an authority to take action against states counting the number of ballots received after Election Day, withholding federal funds from states that refuse to comply with federal voting laws. For more information about Trump's election executive order, click here.

History of vulnerability

It is not a surprise to readers of this publication or other publications in the “alternative media” realm that voting machines are vulnerable to hacking. The issue became infamous after the 2020 presidential election, but before that the system was vulnerable.

In 2017, it took less than a day for participants at the Def Con Hacking Conference to discover and exploit vulnerabilities in five different voting machine types, reported USA Today's affiliate Naples Daily News.

In 2018, the same thing happened. And the report of the meeting that year reached Capitol Hill. At the time, Democrats such as Rep. Jackie Speyer (D-Calif) and Sen. Amy Kulbucher (D-Mine) were open to hearing about the machinery's election vulnerability, as Trump won because of election hacking by Russians.

But in 2020, Trump was a victim of multiple forms of election interference. Most obviously was propaganda and information restraint, including Hunter Biden Laptop Story. That episode alone suggests that some people have tilted the scale to Trump, if reported accurately.

The operation of machines was also suspected in the 2020 election. Investigators such as Dr. David Clements and Michael Gableman have made a compelling argument in support of Gabbard's latest comment that voting machines are vulnerable to operations. Clements' documentary Let My People Go Go goes very long to show how the machine works. You can read Clements' TNA interview here.

Save the act

Amid a positive development on election integrity, the US House passed the Protective Measures American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act with 220-208 votes. The bill won “yeah” votes from all House Republicans and garnered the votes of five Democrats. The proposal essentially calls for evidence of citizenship for those who want to vote in federal elections. It also instructs the state to remove non-citizens from voter roles.

Once in the Senate, the Save Act faces a filibuster threshold of 60 votes.

Constitutional concerns

The Save Act may have been well received by supporters, but there are serious concerns. Constitutional scholar Joe Walburton II, JD outlined such concerns in a September 16th, 2024 TNA article. Some issues with the Save Act are:

It undermines the constitutional understanding of citizenship by broadly categorizing those born in the US soil, regardless of their parents' legal status. It paves the way for foreign influence by expanding citizenship to children of people who have come to the United States illegally, including children from hostile countries such as China, and children from countries affected by radical ideology. That requires documentary proof of citizenship that disproportionately affects women who change their names after marriage.

Walverton believes that the save act is not actually depicted. He concludes:

The true goal of the SAVE Act is not to protect US elections, but to align with the broader globalist agenda of eroding national sovereignty through legislative deceptions. By enforcing American citizens to jump over the hoop and prove their right to vote, simultaneously granting illegal immigrants and diplomat children the right to vote, the Save Act advances a globalist agenda that seeks to consolidate the authority to consolidate and control the US population.

The publication has outlined constitutional and liberal-oriented approaches to securing elections over the years. Election expert Kurt Hyde wrote in the February 15th, 2021 issue that early voting should be abolished, paper voting is required, and machines need to be voted. Unmanned dropboxes must be eliminated if necessary, and the abolition of car voters and HAVA (2002 American Voting Act) and voter IDs were implemented.