With a drastic policy shift, the management budget (OMB) temporarily frozen some federal subsidies, loans, and other financial support programs on Monday. This memo, signed by Au -Director Matthew J. Vas, has outlined a wide range of reviews of federal financial assistance in cooperation with the priority of the newly selected government.
The command, which should be in effect on Tuesday, spread shock waves throughout the country. Federal judges stopped in a wide range of confusion and legal tasks from various non -profit organizations.
On Wednesday, the OMB memo was canceled. White -house spokeswoman Caroline Ribit has revealed that Trump's presidential order continues to be valid for the freezing of federal funding. Leavitt said that the reason for canceling the memo was to eliminate the turmoil caused by the court's instructions.
overview
The two -page memo demanded an institution to stop all duty and expenditure in federal fiscal support while the assessment was performed.
According to the memo:
Federal agencies may be involved in all activities related to all federal financial support or payments, foreign assistance, and non -governmental organizations, but are not limited to these administrative orders. You must temporarily pause in the engine activity. I woke up my gender ideology and green New Deal.
The administration argued that the movement was to guarantee that the taxpayer dollar would be used in a way that matches the agenda. It includes the following:
The stronger and safer United States eliminates the economic burden of citizens inflation, unleashes the energy and manufacturing of the United States, ends the government's “affection” and weapons, promotes government efficiency, and once again the United States. Make it healthy.
Notes and social security are exempt from freezing according to the memo. By February 10, 2025, the government was ordered to report the specific impact of the order.
The government proposed by the government was targeting about $ 3 trillion out of the $ 10 trillion of the federal spending since 2024.
Democratic response
The Democratic Party of Congress showed resistance to OMB's command. Chuck Schumer (DN.Y.), the leader of the Senate minority, blamed the freeze as “more lawful and confusion.” He has accused the government that “does not obey the law” by refraining from the important funds approved by Congress. He also warned that the movement would “miss the salary and missed payments” and urged the government to “turn the course immediately.”
The Democratic Party has already made a note of their opposition to the new administration. Democracy and Communications Committee, led by Hakeem Jeffries (DN.Y.), the leader of the House of Representatives, are actively mobilizing local members and pushing them back. In a memo to the parliamentary office, the committee encourages members to “raise awareness” by holding a press conference with local officials and influenced stakeholders, and the impact on the freezing members. I emphasized.
Senior budget negotiator Rosa Delaulo (D-Kone) and Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash) express “extreme vigilance” in a letter to Vas, “You ordered it. The scope of things is unprecedented, causing catastrophic results throughout the country. “
The White House revealed in the next day's memo that the freeze was not “ship”. It was applied only to programs that were targeted by Trump's presidential order, such as DEI Initiative.
The House of Representatives Democratic Party is planning an emergency association meeting on Wednesday to strategy for what is called “free frozen funding of the illegal Republican party.” In a letter to a colleague, a minority leader outlined three anti -aggressive attacks. Pushbacks include legal issues, legislative operations, and public messages.
GOP response
In contrast, Republican members seemed to support this action.
House of Representatives Mike Johnson (R-La.) Acquired the administration's decision. He stated that the command was “applied to common sense” and “harmless.” Johnson said that the lawsuit has dealt with the Biden administration's “abuse”. He promised that the program review would be “quick.”
Politico has accused many advanced Republican members of the new administration as an obvious unconstitutional action, “line up in a line,” and called Trump's actions “assault” against parliamentary power. According to the report
“You need to understand, he was elected to shake the status quo,” said the majority whip tom emer (R-minn. I called that accurately. “
“I think it's a long time,” said Lisa Maclane (R-Mich), chairman of the Republican Republican Conference. “I hope this will set a precedent.”
Senator Lindsey Graham, a senior member of the Diet, tried to get more details about the target program.
“The top GOP Echelon had few concerns about political rebound, or showed what would happen when the Democratic Party was in charge next.” I attached it.
Judges stop freezing funds
Federal judge Lauren Alican temporarily blocked Trump's financing on Tuesday. The judge determined that the administration could not clearly define which program was affected. This ruling, promoted by a non -profit organization, delays freezing to the court's hearing on Monday. Meanwhile, the 23rd Democratic Secretary of the Democratic Party has filed its own lawsuit. They argue that freezing is unconstitutional and threaten important public services.
Legal consideration: Delegation or seizure?
The legal scrutiny, which was ignited by the OMB command, was not surprising because of concerns about the basic questions of parliamentary power and the power of Congress. Based on the US Constitutional Budget Clinic (Article 9, Article 9, Article 7), the parliament manages the federal expenditure, not the president, and has been very controversial to the one -sided suspension of funding. In 1974, the water storage management law restricts the government's government -approved funds without explicit approval.
Despite these legal constraints, OMB memo asserts that the freezing of funding is assembled as part of a more widespread “delegation” from Americans, and that federal spending should be consistent with the priority of the president. I am. However, the election gives the president the authority to lead the administrative agency, but does not give the authority to unilaterally re -assign or stop federal funds. This is the responsibility that only belongs to Congress. The government's attempt to reconstruct a budget assignment based on the presidential order will definitely test the limitations of the President's power. If it is supported, such an execution will set an example, and the future administration will avoid the authority of Congress in the excuse of execution, and fundamentally change the balance of Washington's power.
