Christians “should be eradicated without hesitation or regret,” so he told “elite” respondents in a sociological study that documented anti-Christian bias in the United States years ago. And again this week I heard that the Idaho National Guard has a policy that “no Christians in orders” is said to have. But our executive branch commander, President Donald Trump, has decided to end such bias. At least that's the federal government. All USA TODAY:
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday to create a Department of Justice task force to eradicate what is known as “anti-Christian bias” within the federal government.
In 2023, the House-elected Subcommittee on Federal Armsification stated that under the pretext of tackling the threat of domestic terrorism, the FBI's Richmond office made certain “radical traditionalist Catholics” violent. It has permeated as a form of threat mitigation in the Catholic Church, which described it as an extremist and said it “suggested an opportunity for the FBI to propose.” ”
…The task force's mission is to “quickly halt all forms of federal anti-Christian targets and discrimination,” including the Department of Justice, the FBI, the IRS and other agencies,” Trump said in his speech. Ta. National prayer breakfast on Thursday.
“In addition, the task force will fully prosecute anti-Christian violence and vandalism in our society, working to move heaven and earth to defend the rights of Christians and religious followers across the country.” He said.
Are there no more lions?
Providing details about the president's remarks, Christian Post reports:
“In recent years, we have seen this sacred freedom be threatened like never before in American history,” Trump said, adding that the Biden administration would be a devout Christian. On the other hand, he claims he was engaged in “persecution.”
Trump cited the example of a 75-year-old pro-life activist who was jailed for violating freedom of access to the clinic (face) for prayer and protest at an abortion clinic.
“They were terrible for you, they were terrible for people of religion, all religions,” Trump continued, saying that he allowed 23 pro-life protesters, including elder activists, when he took office. said it was his honor.
Naysayers dismiss the above as Pandering, but in reality, anti-Christian bias has intensified for decades. For example, Christian businessmen, from bakeries to florists to wedding planners, have been persecuted for many years for refusing to attend fake (same-sex) weddings. Next, consider the following explanation heading:
the study
But the anecdotes really don't tell the story. But perhaps what is the aforementioned study conducted by two North Texas University sociologists a decade ago. These researchers, Professors George Yancey and David Williamson, shared their findings in a 2014 book entitled Christianity.
Scholars say that “Christian phobia” is defined as “an unreasonable hatred or fear of Christians” – is not common among the general public. But it definitely characterizes those of the American upper hierarchy. That's also intense. The book's title was clearly inspired by lamenting that there were “very few lions” that “looks low” and lamenting the practice of throwing Christians into arenas that slaughter Christians into wild cats. Apparently.
And this is what Christians who reported their Christian post in 2015 “need to worry.” This is because “people with 'Christian phobia' tend to be strong elites that influence certain important areas such as higher education,” the site quoted. Yancee said. Commenting on this and the motivation behind conducting the professor's research, Yancey spoke to the post.
There is a lot of literature on hostility towards many different groups, but there is nothing about hostility towards Christians. However, when we collected qualitative data from culturally progressive activists, we quickly saw unnecessary vitriol and fear among many respondents. We also saw the social status of those who showed this hatred, and many of them are in a position to allow them to act at least subtly in their rage and fear. Sho.
Regarding the source of the professor's data, the post wrote it.
It comes from a large national survey, the US National Election Survey, and interviews with members of liberal advocacy groups.
Elite hatred
Regarding these interviews, some of the comments made by “cultural progressive activists” raise eyebrows. As reported by Flame in 2015, about sampling referring to “Christian Rights”:
“I want them all to die in the fire” (men, PhD and ages 26-35) “They should be eradicated without hesitation or regret. Their sole purpose is to be “They believe in eugenics, damaging and giving their fundamentalist virus to everyone they are in contact with.” (women, earning their master's degree at age 66-75) … They pollute the good air… I agree with establishing a nation for them… If not, sterilize them to sterilize them.” (Male, Master's Degree 46-55 years old)
Well, as the saying goes, “No one is more illegal than liberals.” But what specifically explains this intense anti-Christian rage?
The birth of hatred
That's an old story. We all have experience rendering some constructive criticism, but only make the subject of it react to anger. No one likes his bubble bursting. The more people become attached to false ideas and actions, the stronger their resistance becomes.
Enter your Christianity. In this relativistic era of “If that feels good, do it,” ancient beliefs support that absolute, unchanging, unnegotiable standard of morality. It tells people that their sins are truly sin and that they are judged for them, not just for lifestyle choices. And a little truth can crush the rationalization, just as one small pin can burst the balloon.
It is not surprising that Yancey discovered that anti-Christian pseudo-elitists were generally “white, educated (actually misunderstood, in fact) and wealthy.” These are not just the “idol mind,” the “devil's playground.” These aren't just echoing George Orwell. These are the kind of people who can trust intellectuals, who are truly ridiculous ideas. They are also defenders of several anti-Christian movements, including feminism and our great sexual heresy. They usually don't just indulge in sin (people tend to push what they are obsessed with). Furthermore, they came to believe that their very happiness depends on the realization of their social vision – and Christianity gets in the way. And often, the result is, “If it feels good, do it.”
If you feel bad, destroy it.
Back to President Trump, he, of course, cannot alone reverse the social corruption of this secularist. He cannot make federal halls synonymous with piety. But perhaps, he can assure them that they are not a demonic workshop.
