In a recent court filing, the White House sought to clarify the role of Elon Musk in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which aims to overhaul the federal government through AI-driven automation.
In a three-page declaration that Musk will serve as “senior advisor to the president,” Joshua Fisher, director of the White House Administration, said, “there are no actual or formal authority to make government decisions themselves.” I stated.
The statement, filed in a federal court case involving the state attorney general who challenges Musk's influence, does not identify official Doge administrators and furthers concerns about the department's leadership and decision-making process. Furthermore, given the informal role of the “senior advisor”, such ambiguity appears to protect Musk from responsibility, making it almost impossible to monitor legal and parliamentary forces him without accountability. Gives strength.
In early February, the White House identified mask status as “special government employee” (SGE). This designation allows him to serve as a temporary advisor for up to 130 days a year. This status will insult certain exemptions from standard government disclosure rules such as financial disclosure and ethical agreements. This position does not involve complete government responsibility or oversight.
Official Statement
Despite the official White House clarification that Musk does not have formal authority over Doge, both Trump and Musk have spoken consistently as if Musk was leading the initiative.
From campaign rhetoric to countless social media posts, interviews and public appearances, both men clearly portray masks as key figures in Doge's leadership.
The most direct example was on February 11 when a mask appeared with Trump in an oval office to discuss Doge's mission. During the event, Trump called Doge “your team.” That day, Trump signed an executive order expanding Doge's authority to “optimize” the federal workforce, further strengthening the impact of masks on agency orientation.
Just two days later, on February 13th, Musk spoke via video link at the World Government Summit in Dubai. Wearing a “Technical Support” T-shirt, he spoke about Doge's transformational approach to digitalising and automating government operations. Musk's comments are intimately consistent with Doge's stated mission, and the line between his de facto role in leading the initiative and the official White House position that denies his formal authority. I made it even more vague.
Doge's website
Doge's official website would be of little use if we set out to explore what exactly is responsible for the fundamental transformation of the federal government.
The site does not clarify who is actually in charge, the defined monitoring structure, or details of the disclosed budget. Instead of transparency, it presents a vague, self-conditional narrative packed with promotional material from Musk's social media platforms.
Furthermore, due to the initiative that advocates budget efficiency as one of its central objectives, Doge's most publicly promoted achievement, “savings,” remains unclear.
The Savings page estimates $55 billion in savings through measures such as fraud detection, contract cancellation, asset sales and labor reductions. However, the details provided are minimal. These include only a subset of contracts and lease cancellations, accounting for only 20% of reported savings.
The remaining 80% of Doge's alleged economic impacts are undocumented, making it impossible to independently verify the legitimacy of these savings or assess the long-term economic impact. The site promises that all data will ultimately be uploaded in a “digestible and completely transparent way”, but at this point it is nothing more than a headline number that is not actually accountable.
Lawsuits against Doji and Musk
As concerns over Doge's unidentified power mount, two major lawsuits (one filed by the state government, filed by federal employees) challenge Musk's role and the legality of Doge itself. It's there. Musk is the appointed defendant in a state case that challenges his authority within the federal government directly.
At the heart of the state's lawsuits are the appointment provisions of the US Constitution, requiring that high-level federal employees be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The lawsuit, despite the lack of a formal title on the mask, has used more enforcement than federal agencies, directing budget freezes, massive layoffs and data access across multiple government departments. – They all claim that they are not approved by Congress.
Meanwhile, federal employees filed lawsuits against Trump and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). They allege that Doge illegally accesses confidential personal information from federal employees and violates the 1974 Privacy Act. The plaintiffs allege that Doge obtained this data without an appropriate national security review and used it for discriminatory and illegal purposes. This includes targeting fraudulent acquisitions and termination employees.
While Trump is fully in favor of Musk's activities, the outcome of these lawsuits could set important legal precedents regarding the limitations of presidential authority when delegating individuals to individuals.
Doge: Unanswered Questions
So far, the US government's most audacious reengineering in history remains frustratingly secretive. Headlines and musklanx trumpet doges are assumed to be “effects” in robbing government while saving billions of dollars, but the deeper reality of leadership, surveillance and long-term outcomes remain ambiguous.
Who actually runs Doge?
The lack of appointed administrators suggests that Doge works in a non-transparent, unshaded way. If the mask is not officially in charge, who is actually making the enforcement decision? If Doge is operating under Trump's administration, how closely does the president monitor directly? And why did that true leadership identity remain private?
This ambiguity protects Doge decision makers from legal and parliamentary scrutiny, allowing major government restructuring efforts to proceed without clear accountability.
The influence of musk
The White House claims that Musk has no formal authority, but his public appearance and Trump's own words suggest that this is not the case. Doge reportedly has young Musk loyalists in place, making it increasingly difficult to know where the government will end and the business power will begin.
What emerges is not just policy change, but fundamental change in governance. As the role of musk remains denied and undeniable, the boundary between the democratic state and the olihead that driven AI is dangerously thin.
The possibility of a corporate conflict of interest is clearly evident. Musk's Business – Tesla, SpaceX, X, Neuralink relies on advances in AI. When Doge automates government processes, these companies can benefit in ways that the public doesn't deserve.
Automation, AI, and data control
The basic premise of Doge is to embed AI into government functions. This poses a deep risk.
If AI systems controlled by mask associates manage federal records, who guarantees data security? Can private companies access confidential information? How can AI algorithms be ensured if development and applications are controlled by private interests? Without Congressional oversight, who ensures that AI-led governance remains ethical and fair? Finally, who is accountable for the decisions made by AI, especially if those decisions result in harm or bias?
In the darkness
The combination of secrecy, the unidentified impact of masks, AI-driven decisions and the potential for corporate conflicts of interest makes Doge one of the most opaque and risky initiatives in modern US governance.
It remains an experiment in algorithmic governance, up to the basic questions of who will implement Doge, how that decision will be made, and how conflicts of interest will be addressed.
Related:
Reprogramming of the Republic: Musk's quiet AI federal acquisition
AI and federal wallets: Musk's reform of Treasury surveillance
Doge at the Pentagon: A more “efficient” war business
Trump announces $500 billion “Stargate” AI project in line with the WEF Agenda
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
English
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish