The former Canadian woman, Landrady, fined $10,000, telling her that she was “transphobic”

The Canadian woman was awarded $10,000. Because it is said that her ex-friend and landlady made a “transphobic” comment on her while she was living in her ex-friend's property.

According to the National Post Office in Toronto, the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (HRT) ordered Kirsten Olsen to pay Terry Weave the summary last month as “compensation for (Weave's) dignity, emotion and self-esteem.” Ta. The three court committees have said that Olsen, as the landlady of Weave, discriminating against Weave in her words, in particular Weave's intention to undergo a double mastectomy to complete the “transition” to him. I discovered that people who expressed discomfort discriminated against in her words.

LGBT RV

Wiebe lived in a car on the property of his then-Friend Olsen from 2014 to 2018 and paid a $200 rent a month, the Vancouver Sun reported.

In November 2016, Weaby, who determined she was transgender, began hormone therapy to acquire male traits. She told Olsen in April 2017 that she was planning to remove her breasts.

More than 19 months later, in December 2018, Olsen kicked Weave out of her property. This post was written by Olsen in court testimony

He explained that he wanted to kick Weave out not because of transgender surgery, but because of Wiebe's “increasingly unstable” behavior. Wiebe's “lack of proper boundaries” is said to have created “unsightful” and Wiebe's “dispersed with Iracic acid” behavior following a romantic split. . Olsen testified that Wiebe “screams” about how they “go back.” Her tenants scared her. Olsen also said he wanted to move his mother to his property.

(Wiebe's preferred use of pronouns, they and they are a clear indication of panel bias, permeating the HRT verdict.)

Further signs that Wiebe's eviction had nothing to do with her gender change, eight months after learning planned surgery for Wiebe, Olsen took charge of Olsen's property and business while Olsen was away. That's what it is.

Olsen testified that Wiebe suspected that he deliberately linked the wrong tank to the business's ventilation system while Olsen was away. Weebe claimed that the supplier delivered the wrong tank, but Olsen said that security camera footage was removed, revealing that the wrong tank had reached it and who connected it to the vent. I discovered it. It certainly suggests a foul play, but Olsen had no evidence that Wiebe was behind it. (HRT didn't dig into the issue.)

Lost in the transition

Weave argued that on her part, her eviction was primarily motivated by Olsen's aversion to her gender transition. According to the HRT ruling, Wiebe said, “We asked Olsen multiple times whether the tenants would be affected if they had sex-affirmed surgery. Olsen did not respond directly, but she said. I said I felt uncomfortable with it.”

On top of that, Olsen told her, “You're fine as a lesbian” and “There's no need to cut your body.”

In fact, Wiebe stopped treating her gender and told Olsen it was due to medical complications and unwanted facial hair. (Apparently, she liked being a man in theory, but in reality it wasn't.)

Olsen claimed that Wiebe made the statement “You're fine” after telling her that she was quitting treatment as a way to comfort her. She denied making “cutting” statements so far. The HRT ruled that Olsen actually warned Wiebe against cutting her body about the strength of the testimony that “they” sided with.

A biased court gives partial victory

In a sane world, of course, Olsen is free to oust tenants for reasons she chooses, whatever she wants with her property. However, in an awakened world, the free exercise of one's rights is entirely dependent on the oppressed group claiming membership. HRT, therefore, at the same time, Wiebe has not been kicked out about her gender change (they accepted Olsen's explanation), but nonetheless, Olsen's gender comments have an “profound” effect on her. He ruled that he was entitled to $10,000 from her former landlady.

As Olsen's “lesbian” and “cutting” comments were voiced outside the door to her trailer, she and Weebe often had conversations as friends, so the court said they were “not “Weebe's” tenants, but “the parties' We determined it was related to a personal relationship.'' Therefore, they did not constitute discrimination under British Columbia's human rights law, HRT said.

Meanwhile, when Olsen refused to directly answer Wiebe's question about whether she could remain on her property after surgery, she said, “The message that if Terry Wiebe takes further steps to change her gender, she will lose her home.” I sent it.” HRT. Therefore, Olsen was “discriminated against” against Weave, causing “a negative effect on (her) tenants” and now owed what was equivalent to 50 months of rent. (That may have gotten worse. If the court was found guilty of kicking out Weave with her intended surgery, Olsen could have gone socks at an additional $50,000 rating.)

Misgender regret

It was a natural conclusion that HRT would take control over Wiebe to some extent. In addition to ensuring they will mention Weave by her preferred pronoun in the decision, the panel, in its own initiative – apologies for not police use of all pronouns during court cases. and thereby allow her “frequently” and “frequently” to “frequently.” “I regret that the process hurt them (Weebe),” HRT wrote.

Meanwhile, harm to Olsen caused no regrets to the panel.