“There's a long list of things the federal government is completely lying to us. We don't know everything they're hiding,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said this Monday when he appeared on political commentator Benny Johnson's YouTube show.
As far as Senators are concerned, the list of cover-ups includes the assassination of the Kennedy brothers and Martin Luther King Jr., January 6th, Tonkin Loose Bay and, of course, all official stories linked essentially to Covid-19.
And now the opposite senator – he has been a key leader in all Covid's quest for truth – is adding another major event to the list of government cover-ups.
“What actually happened on 9/11? What do we know? What is hidden? My guess is there is a terrible amount of hidden hidden in regards to what the US government knows about 9/11,” Senator Johnson recently told Benny Johnson.
Weldon speaks
Renewed interest in Senator Johnson's 9/11 revelation began with the public reappearance of former high-ranking lawmakers. Former Pennsylvania representative Kurt Weldon appeared at many alternative media shows in mid-April, including Tucker Carlson. He has brought him an explosive claim that the most lethal attack on American soil is concealment. He claims that the US intelligence agency knew about the terrorist plan to commit 9/11 a year ago. The CIA knew that Osama bin Laden was not in Afghanistan, but the US military is on a mission to find him, and the official reasons for the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings are wrong.
Weldon represented Pennsylvania's District 7 for 20 years until 2006. He served as the Vice-President of the House Armed Services Committee and the House Homeland Security Committee. He rekindled hope among those who already believed 9/11 was a cover-up, and he opened the eyes of many who had not previously thought 9/11. Senator Johnson appears to be one of the latter categories.
New research
Interest in Senator Johnson's issues could prove crucial. He is not only a sitting senator, but also on the Senate's permanent subcommittee on investigations. He then suggested to Benny Johnson that he was already thinking about reopening the 9/11 Pandora box. He said, “To be honest, my eyes have been opened so I have a lot of questions that I ask very honestly. I spoke to former MP Kurt Weldon. I will work with him…
Building 7
The main focus of his new mission appears to lie on Building 7 of the 47-storey World Trade Center. He collapsed on July 11th just after 5pm. Officially, debris from nearby North Tower (WTC 1) fell as it lit a fire in Building 7. However, even the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which determined the official narrative of the collapse of all three buildings, admitted in its 2008 final report that its downfall was unprecedented. “This was the first known example of complete collapse of the building, primarily due to fires,” the report said.
The current substation and power plant were located under Building 7. The building happened to have a large amount of diesel oil storage. However, according to NIST, “The fuel fire did not play a role in the collapse of WTC 7” and more:
The worst-case scenario associated with fires fed by the ruptured line (a) would have either not lasted long enough or produced sufficient heat to raise the temperature of the critical internal row to a point of significant loss of strength or stiffness, or (b) would not have produced a large amount of visible smoke generated from the exhaust louvers. No such smoke was observed.
The collapse of the North Tower caused fires mainly on the seventh floor, at least 10 floors, between the seventh and seventeenth floors. The fire passed through available fuel without resistance as the collapse of the two towers damaged the sprinkler system. If that hadn't happened, the outcome would have been different. NIST states, “If water supply from an automatic sprinkler system is available and the sprinkler system is operating as designed, it could be that fires (Building 7) are controlled and collapsed.”
However, according to NIST, the moment of truth is when a row in the northeastern part of the building is given. The row failed in nine stories after the fire damage caused a “cascade of local floor breakdowns.” Next, NIST explains the following domino effects:
The column was not supported over the nine stories after the damage caused by the first local fire led to a cascade of local floor breakdowns. This buckling of the column led to vertical floor obstructions to the roof, leading to buckling of the interior column adjacent to the south of the critical column. Loss of lateral support to adjacent columns, force exerted by the falling debris, and load redistribution from other buckled columns led to a horizontal east-to-west progression of internal column buckling. The failed building core then moved downwards and redistributed the load to the exterior column, causing the exterior column to buckle. A global collapse occurred when the entire building core moved downwards as a single unit. This was a fire-induced progressive disruption, also known as an imbalance collapse, which was defined from start-event to element-to-element as a spread extension of local damage, ultimately resulting in a collapse of the entire structure.
I'm not convinced
However, some people were unconvinced by Nist's explanation, such as Leroy Hulsey, a forensic engineer who is a professor at the University of Alaska. In 2015, Hulsey and the PhD crew students conducted a four-year, $300,000 survey to determine how Building 7 fell. They used computer modeling to rebuild it according to the original plan. In 2019, Hulsey published the conclusions of a study entitled “Structural Reassessment of the Collapse of the World Trade Center 7.”
Hulsey said he concluded Nist that the fire that pulled the building down was wrong and impossible. “Did the 79 building collapse from the fire? The answer is no. The bearings for the column 79 girder moved to less than two inches. There was no problem,” says Hulsey. His report said the only way the building collapsed was that all support beams failed simultaneously, suggesting a controlled demolition. According to the survey:
The fire could not cause weakening or displacement of structural members that could initiate hypothetical local failures that were allegedly causing the complete collapse of the building. All rows in the building. This conclusion is based primarily on the finding that simultaneous failures of all 8-storey core rows followed 1.3 seconds later, followed by simultaneous failures of all 8-storey external rows generate almost accurate behavior observed in the collapse video, whereas other failures we simulated did not produce the observed behavior. It cannot be completely ruled out that another scenario may have caused the observed collapse. However, near-simultaneous failures in all columns are the only scenarios that can generate observed behavior.
Some speculate that someone might have wanted to defeat Building 7 for the secret CIA station within it. The station posed as another federal agency that hired and recruited UN diplomats, reporting that “UN foreign diplomats are willing to talk to the CIA and “American business executives” and to speak to the CIA.” The agents working there pretended to be diplomats and executives. After the attack, the CIA dispatched a special team to collect secret documents and information reports.
The silver lining of Building 7's collapse means that people are not dead. By the time it got off, everyone in the building had already evacuated.
Related Articles:
Former MP Kurt Weldon resurfaces with explosive claims about 9/11's “cover-up”
Thirty years later, cover-up of OKC bombing
