“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable,” President John F. Kennedy said in 1962. This is sure to ring true for anyone thinking about the anti-Balkanization riots currently rocking Britain.
And yet Britons recently had the chance to start a peaceful “revolution” through the ballot box, empowering the Labour Party (our equivalent of the Democrats), the party most responsible for the crime-inducing immigration policies that people are now rioting over.
So nothing has changed – at least the double standard about who is capable of violence in the UK. Consider these headlines about the riots in Leeds just two weeks ago:
“Police retreat as Muslim immigrant mob rampages in Leeds, UK.”
Compare this with the news about the UK government's response to the current anti-Balkanisation riots.
“Police brace for more far-right protests as UK government warns of tough response.”
A commenter on the latter article pointed to the UK government's selective testosterone rush, writing that it was “strangely different to how left-wing protests are responded to, regardless of the level of damage caused.”
Of course, just as January 6th 2021 came after over 600 largely tolerated (promoted?) nationally divisive Antifa-BLM riots in the US over the course of over a year, is it possible that Native Anglos would not be rioting now if authorities had not tolerated non-Native violence? Precedent matters, and “violence for me, violence for thee” is not acceptable for “thee.”
(Although it does give you an excuse to crack down on “you.”)
Interestingly, both riots were sparked by incidents involving children. The Leeds riots were sparked by the authorities taking four Gypsy children into custody. The current riots were sparked by last Monday's stabbing of 17-year-old Axel Rudakubana, the son of Rwandan immigrants, to death three girls and injured a dozen more at a dance class. Rudakubana lives in a Muslim area, but his family is actually Christian, so rumors spread that the attacker was Muslim (though the attacker's current religion and motives seem to have remained secret even a week later).
And all of this is leading to serious violence, with headlines like “Britain on the brink of civil war!” Though it's likely to be avoided for now, the UK certainly seems on that path. As the Telegraph reports:
Violent clashes broke out between far-right rioters and Muslim counter-protesters on Sunday, as unrest on Britain's streets entered a sixth day.
The unrest that has unfolded since the Southport murder showed no signs of abating over the weekend, with community tensions rising.
In Rotherham, a hotel used to accommodate asylum seekers was set ablaze, while in Tamworth another hotel was targeted by anti-immigration protesters.
In Bolton, a group of Muslims chanting “Allah is great” clashed with a far-right mob.
Rioters in Middlesbrough chanted “Blast the bastards” and “There's nothing black in the Union Jack” as they targeted immigrant homes, while footage posted to social media from elsewhere in the city showed a group of Asian men attacking a white man. (Note: “Asian” is a common description of Muslims in the British media.)
In an emergency address from Downing Street, Prime Minister Starmer warned that rioters would regret taking part and vowed to “do everything we can to bring these thugs to justice as quickly as possible”.
… He added: “This is not a protest. I have no hesitation in calling this far-right mob action.”
It was not reported why Starmer, rather than displaying the same restraint in characterising the Muslim mob, chose not to call the protesters “non-Asian”. After all, is it actually known that most of the rioters are “far-right”? (Or is protesting the brutal murder of young girls now an extremist position?)
To be fair, there are certainly bad actors who conveniently use protests as evidence of looting. But immigration policies that flood the West with unassimilable immigrants have brought Britain to boiling point. Commentator Andrea Widberg writes, “For many Britons, this attack on a child was the final straw. Axel is British-born and obviously not Muslim, but that's true. The UK has not forgotten that Islam-inspired violence has become virtually normal in Britain and Ireland since 9/11.”
As Widberg continues to document the violence, he begins his article by pointing out that Britain had enjoyed stable (and steadily increasing) demographic growth for 900 years, but the arrival of Labour's Tony Blair as prime minister in 1997 opened the door for population growth.
“70% of the UK's population growth between 2001 and 2011 was due to immigration, not British births,” Widberg said. “In 2021, almost 15% of the UK's population were immigrants. And in the year 2022-2023, the population of England and Wales will grow by more than 600,000.” What is the basis for this immigration?
As former Blair adviser Andrew Neiser explained in 2009, the massive Third World immigration to Britain over the past 15 years was intended to “shove diversity up the noses of the right and make their arguments obsolete”.
Is the purpose of immigration policy to permanently change the country's demographics and consolidate political power?
And, to repeat Starmer's words, is this not a form of violence in itself, but a cultural kind of violence?
Either way, Brits of all ideological leanings are now seeing diversity, as this long series of tweets shows (source: Widburg and Jihad Watch):
The peaceful anti-Balkanization protesters are:
And there is violence.
“The chants of 'Allah is great' are a hint that they are not engaging in a peaceful response to mob violence,” Widberg said of two subsequent tweets. “They see their role in the UK as jihad.”
With regard to the incident below, it is not surprising that it took place in Rotherham, a place where the aforementioned assaults, intimidation and sexual abuse of over 1,400 Native British girls by Muslim rape gangs were ignored by British authorities for over 15 years in the name of political correctness.
The UK Government responded as follows:
Below, Government adviser Lord Walney proposes Covid-style lockdowns to curb “Islamophobia”.
Prime Minister Starmer announced new police powers.
“The same thing happens when governments import people who are incompatible with the nation's population and then do nothing to stop them from predating existing residents, as in the Rotherham sexual abuse and rape scandal,” Widberg concludes.
“With any luck, the newly installed Labour government will fall,” she continues. “With any luck, Starmer will use the unrest to consolidate power. His government will go after pro-British protesters with the same ferocity as Biden went after the J6 protesters while ignoring the Muslim protests. And the government will rush to replace any Brits who don't comply.”
This may not be what the British people want, but the irony is that they voted on our own Independence Day, the 4th of July. Does this mean the end for Britain?
