New Judgment Rules could give longer sentences to British people whiter than “minorities” of the same crime

In the US, DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) is undergoing a pushback, and we hope many hope Dei die. However, in the UK, this phenomenon may be alive and well, poised to strengthen what is already a two-stage judicial system. A suitable case is the new ruling guidelines that give shorter sentences for Muslims and other “minorities” than white people of the same crime.

For each GB:

Is the UK legal system now officially anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-male, anti-heterosexual?

Today, all magistrates were emailed saying there are new sentencing guidelines to be enforced when considering sending someone to prison.

It appears to entice the justice of two tiers into the law. One sentence for potentially white, Christian, straight men, and ethnic minorities, cultural minorities, and trans people.

It can be viewed in black and white.

When deciding on a sentence, magistrates should consider whether there are guilty people and quote them as “from ethnic minorities, cultural minorities, and/or minority communities of faith.”

why? What does that mean?

In my opinion, this has two explanations. First, this is the bias of low expectations. They must have lived a more difficult life? “An absolute load of garbage.

Second: Straight up, anti-white racism.

This is where a keen cultural observer might say, “take 'straight, anti-white racism' for 500, Alex.”

A story about the present era

After all, the prejudice and affection of the general opposition in Britain is nothing new. For example, British authorities have ignored the rape and brutality of tens of thousands of white girls over more than a decade. why?

This is because the perpetrators were mainly Muslim Pakistani men.

In fact, one whistleblower was actually given a warning. “You should not (again) mention Asian (Muslim) men,” she was told. And she had to raise her “awareness of ethnic issues.”

Some may say this does not reflect anti-white bias. Rather, it is driven by politically correct social pressures to avoid being perceived as “racist.” However, the problem is that there are overlaps.

In other words, double standards that benefit “minorities” are often justified by the theory that they are “repressed.” Of course, the oppressors are majority groups, such as white people.

Moreover, generally speaking, those charged with enforcing fraud will feel sick if they accept that they are conspiring like that. So they streamline. They are sure, yeah, those citizenship theorists are right. This or that group is oppressive! Balancing the scale is important. After that, they can proceed with the approval of their conscience and sleep well at night.

Good news

To be clear, the new UK guidelines are not “legal” because this story is misreported. Rather, they are rules issued by an entity called the Judgment Council. However, the agency is independent of British lawmakers. In other words, the latter cannot override decisions under current law. (Apparently, there are also deep national bureaucrats in the UK.)

But the good news is that many British politicians are denounceing the guidelines. As the Guardian on the Left reports:

The pastor criticized the plan that would make the criminals' ethnic background a greater factor in deciding whether to incarcerate them, saying they were equivalent to a “two-tier system” of justice.

Industry Minister Sarah Jones said the government opposed the guidance released by the Judgment Councils of England and Wales on Wednesday.

…When asked about the new guidelines for LBC radio, Jones said: I think it's really important in the country that people trust the judicial system we have.

Attorney General Shabana Mahmoud said overnight that he would write to the Judgment Council to register my complaints and encourage them to reverse this change into guidance.

She added: There is never a two-tier ruling approach under my watch. ”

In the video below, British Secretary of Justice Robert Jenrik opposes the guidelines. (Related parts start at 0:35.)

A stale error

The BBC points out that the Judgment Council can rebel against Mahmood and other politicians and leave a dilemma. They can negate the council through legislation and be exposed to awakened rage. Or they could be accused of accepting guidelines institutions and enabling two levels of justice.

But in reality, despite Mahmoud's claims, the second tier justice is, more importantly, that cultural norms are already in the UK. The aforementioned rape gang scandal probably shows this ideally. In fact, these phenomena are current throughout the Western world.

Consider the 2021 story about a Texas town that used teenage stupidity to justify anti-white social engineering. Or, in the news now, consider the leftist accusations that brutally murdered white children become “white hegemony.”

It's all back to the late radio giant Rush Limbaugh, which radio giant Rush Limbaugh said decades ago. All politically correct, positive action programs, quotas, and set-asides are not driven primarily by compassion.

Instead, they said it was about “em-yem-ow-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-with-.

(Of course, there is also a motive for power among politicians.)

Limbaugh was right. Furthermore, the issue is the cultural movement, a cultural movement that permeates almost everything, and its supporters recognize that they are conditioned to mistake awakened command for virtue. Therefore, they often advance the enthusiasm born out of self-righteousness.

It takes time to correct this – winning one election is not enough. There must be cultural ocean changes. Awakened social engineers must be removed from power when identified. Then, what was prescribed decades ago must be applied to curb traditionalist objections.

Social pressure must be used to silence awakened instigation so that the corresponding theory is not welcome in a polite society. And when pondering this, don't forget: Culture Wars is a zero-sum game – you win or you lose.