Although we don't need it, more evidence emerged in X today explaining why Democrats are so upset about the work of the Government's Department of Efficiency (DOGE) and the investigation into the US International Development Agency, USAID.
This outfit is just a pot of money for the non-governmental organization on the left.
Latest news: Stephanie Psaki – former president Joe Biden, sister to MSNBC speaker Jen Psaki, spokesman for Stephanie Psaki – Karine Jean-Pierre, worked for a non-governmental organization called the Population Council.
The group has collected nearly $450 million from US taxpayers since 2008, with the majority of which being nearly $360 million from USAID.
Great money for anything
The revelation comes from Natalie Winters, who co-hosted Steve Bannon's War Room.
“The younger sister of MSNBC host Jen Psaki has been working for nearly a decade at Population Council International, a recipient of hundreds of millions of dollars from USAID,” she writes.
The group lists USAID as one of its official partners.
Why doesn't Jen disclose this! ?
And you don't know, Stephanie Pasaki struggled at the Biden White House, like her sister. She is a “coordinator of global health security,” and that is definitely the position that changed “global health security,” and whatever that is, it's better.
Translation: She raised a huge salary from taxpayers, even if 99.99% of Americans didn't even know the White House “coordinators of global health security.”
Anyway, the meat of the story continued. Winters revealed that the group has received approximately $430 million since 2008.
In fact, a closer look at the data shows that the Population Council has won taxpayers out of $440.4 million.
Winters data did not include $10.9 million grants from 2023 and 2024. $7.1 million and $3.8 million.
Approximately 81% of that money, $358.32 million, came from USAID.
Jen Psaki laughed at winter.
“You caught us @nataliegwinters!” The activists on both sides wrote:
With a PhD in Public Health and decades of experience trying to address global health disparities, my sister actually worked for an organization focused on doing just that. Goals (in addition to dealing with corruption and helping people around the world feed and treat USAID stocks). Congratulations!
Maybe, but Madame Psaki didn't explain two things. One is not Psaki Sisters, but taxpayers who “help people”; The other two can do their jobs. However, taxpayer contributions are important. The two far left Democrats seem surprisingly skilled at finding themselves as paying employees for an organization that lives in hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars.
Other wasteful spending
So, yes, winter caught them. And anyway, as Doge has shown, all of that booty doesn't seem to do much good, like the taxpayer money spent by USAID and other government agencies.
Instead, USAID has wasted hundreds of millions of dollars on the pet project on the left and transferred to top news organizations.
Regarding ridiculous spending, the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee has revealed the following that flowed from the USAID sources:
•$15 million for condoms to the Taliban.
•For “I'm a Caribbean LGBTQ,” $3,315,446.
•$2.5 million to build an electric vehicle charging station in Vietnam's largest city.
•$1.5 million to promote employment opportunities for LGBTQ individuals in Serbia. and,
•$425,622 to help Indonesian coffee companies become more climate-friendly and gender-friendly.
Additionally, we present some examples of how the State Department used taxes.
• $14 million cash voucher for immigrants on the tropical border.
•$3.2 million to help Tunisian immigrants come to life in Tunisia after deportation.
•$1 million to increase French-speaking LGBTQ groups in West and Central Africa.
•$446,700 to promote the expansion of Nepal's atheism. etc.
There are more, but you can get ideas.
But the worst is arbitrary and whimsical spending of taxes on the media.
The New York Times pocketed about $50 million from taxpayers over the years, while Far-Left Politico raised about $34 million.
The Associated Press reported that another left and right news outfit, which appears to be another left and right news outfit, has remained at a $37.5 million song in the taxpayer's pocket.
The so-called journalistic outfit linked to President Trump's first blast each received $11.7 million.
However, the biggest freeloader of the journalism giants is Reuters News & Media. That view: $1.2 billion since 2008.
It's no wonder USAID sued Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa to threaten him with seeking his finances. And it's no wonder it tried to deny permission to look at Doggers' finances.
Democrats and left USAID employees complained that Dogger put USAID's job at risk, but they are likely to be worried about spending being exposed.
“USAID is a criminal organization,” Doge Chieftain Elon Musk wrote to X:
