Will the capons finally come home to the doctors who prescribe “transgender” treatments to children and cause irreparable harm? This may be the case if there are signs of a new medical malpractice lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed by a woman who was prescribed puberty-suppressing drugs at age 12 and, incredibly, had a double mastectomy at age 14.
It's been a while since this happened. In 2021, I lamented that it is surprising that lawsuits like this are happening, although this is not the first time.
This is because (the doctors in question) have long been harming people with prescriptions that have no scientific basis and are guilty of child abuse, as the American Academy of Pediatrics essentially stated in 2016. It's no longer a trend.
And how many would describe child abuse as trespassing in the very current narrative? The Daily Signal reports:
When Clementine Breen started taking puberty blockers at age 12, she never thought she would agree to become a lifelong patient.
Breen, now a 20-year-old detransitioner, filed a lawsuit last Thursday against Dr. Joanna Olson-Kennedy, a prominent child gender expert, alleging medical negligence.
Breen said President Olson-Kennedy forced her into irreversible transgender medical intervention when she was just 12 years old, without proper psychological testing, monitoring of her mental health or the side effects of hormone therapy. says.
“I think telling me that the only cure for my body problems was to transition was the worst thing for me because, looking back, I just have PTSD. It’s just that,” Breen told The Daily Signal. “I needed treatment for something that happened to me as a child.”
Now a student at the University of California, Los Angeles, Breen not only started taking puberty blockers at age 12 and testosterone at age 13; Then, at the age of 14, she underwent a “top surgery” – a double mastectomy.
Children on the (un)assembly line
As shocking as this is, Breen's story is also more common than many people realize. Just ask Jamie Reid, a former “transgender” clinic case manager who describes herself as “politically to the left of Bernie Sanders.” Reid quit her job in 2022 because her former employer's medical practices were “morally and medically abysmal.” Specifically, she says, at a clinic called the Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children's Hospital, children are reflexively given MUSS (made sexual status, also known as “transgender”) treatment on an assembly-line basis. say. This is despite the fact that these young people's actual problems stem from other issues. For example, Reid said many people had “depression, anxiety, ADHD, eating disorders, obesity… (and) autism or autism-like symptoms.”
With this in mind, let's consider the rest of Breen's story. Her complaint states that she was a “vulnerable young girl suffering from complex mental health issues.” Just the News reports that Breen further said in the lawsuit:
The sexual abuse, which began at age 6 or 7, may be linked to Breen's “anxiety, depression, presumed autism, and undiagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder,” Breen said. He attributed this to his brother who was severely autistic, and that his autism caused him to commit violent acts and become violent himself. “It creates a very unstable and difficult family environment,” she said, but the defendant failed to investigate any of that.
…The lawsuit alleges that Olson-Kennedy and fellow defendants CHLA, University of California, San Francisco St. Francis Memorial Hospital, surgeon Scott Mosser and the Gender Affirmation Center of San Francisco, and therapist Susan Landon told Breen's parents the truth. It details allegations that he “made numerous materially false statements” in order to obtain an understanding of the law. Follow recommended care.
They include that the blocker is “completely reversible” (a claim that polarizes the Biden administration) and that Breen would commit suicide if subsequently denied testosterone. She claimed that Mr. Mosser never discussed the letters of recommendation from Mr. Olson-Kennedy and Mr. Landon with Mr. Breen, nor did they even meet before the surgery.
emotional blackmail
This is not surprising. Mus sexual distortion therapy (SDT) peddlers often use a pushy approach to patients and their parents. The standard line is, “Would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter?” But this is a deception.
Not only is gender switching impossible, but the data shows exactly the opposite of what SDT advocates claim. As the American Academy of Pediatrics (ACPeds) stated in a 2016 statement, “Even in Sweden, one of the most LGBQT-affirming countries, the number of adults who use cross-sex hormones and have had gender reassignment surgery The suicide rate is 20 times higher.
Is this surprising? All evidence points to the confusion in what we call gender dysphoria to be a psychological problem. And changing your body when you need to change your mind is like changing your computer's hardware to solve a software problem.
Hard currency for soft science
But again, sadly, the MUSS agenda has destroyed the lives of many young (and old) people. There was Nathaniel (last name withheld for privacy reasons) who was castrated while still a teenager. In 2019, he called his SDT a “Frankenstein hack job” and sadly confessed, “I feel like I've ruined my life.”
And then there's the girl known as “Milo.” She was the poster child for the MUSS agenda. Last year, she admitted her SDT was a “big mistake”. Unfortunately, this was after the butcher had already performed a double mastectomy and hysterectomy on her.
There's also Paul Lowe, who now regrets his genital mutilation surgery in 1989. Feeling stuck, he wants to revive his old self, but says it's no use. “I'll never be fully human again,” he laments. “There's no turning back now.”
Note: You can find many more articles like this at SexChangeRegret.com.
So how can we end this child abuse? Jamie Reid, quoted above, essentially said that doctors at SDT clinics would reasonably eliminate the problematic nature of their “treatments.” This is not surprising. Author Upton Sinclair says: “It's hard to make people understand something if their pay depends on them not understanding it.'' But therein lies the answer.
The income of these SDT promoters must depend on their understanding and acceptance of reality. They must be sued relentlessly until medical malpractice insurance companies no longer cover mutilation treatments. After all, that's the only treatment that works for people who follow money and not science.
