For over half a century, Americans have been successful in believing that injecting fluoride into American public water systems is beneficial.
The spell broke in September, and the age of urban water fluorination may come to a slow yet solid purpose.
Utah is set up to completely prohibit fluoride from public water systems. Beehive's legislature has sent a bill for Republican Gov. Spencer Cox to sign this to achieve this. Among the anti-florolido population, there is hope that this will be the first of 50 dominos.
Yutan, worried that this could lead to more dentist visits, should not bother you. The bill gives new authority to pharmacists to prescribe fluoride supplement pills.
Rep. Stephanie Grisius sponsored the Fluoride Bill. She told the defender:
I firmly believe that the proper role of government is not to provide large-scale medical care for the masses, but to provide safe and clean drinking water. I also believe in medical freedom, so I wanted to make fluoride available to anyone who wanted it for themselves or their children. So we made the prescription easier to get at the pharmacy.
The lawsuit that changed everything
In September, California federal judge Edward Chen ordered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to take action after monitoring the plaintiffs who claimed that fluoride exposure was associated with a decline in children's IQ based on multiple studies. The Fluoride Action Network (Fan), the mother of fluorination, and other plaintiffs filed suits against the EPA. This is sueing a verdict.
Chen's decision came shortly after a report that was published at the time by the US Department of Health and Human Services' National Toxicology Program (NTP). According to a summary of the findings:
With moderate confidence, the NTP monograph concluded that higher levels of fluoride exposure, such as drinking water containing more than 1.5 milligrams of fluoride per liter, is associated with a lower IQ in children. The NTP review is designed to assess total fluoride exposure from all sources, not to assess the health effects of fluorinated drinking water alone.
Critics of water fluorination argue that it is nearly impossible to ensure that people only take the recommended dose, even if the recommended dose does not pose a health risk. Americans consume fluoride from multiple sources, not just tap water. Fluoride is found in toothpaste, soda, canned foods, and mouthwash. In an article in 1992 titled “Fluoridation Revisited,” Murray Rothbird pointed out the absurdity of water fluorination.
It is clearly clear that one of the keys to drugs is dose control. It is very clear that at different stages of risk, different people need individual dosages tailored to their needs. Still, because the water is forced to fluorinate, the dosage applies to everyone and is inevitably proportional to the amount of one glass of water. What is the medical validity of a drinker who drinks 10 drinks a day water per day? The whole process is ridiculous and ridiculous.
In fact, fluorinated water causes massive disease. If anyone knows this, it's the people of Utah. Sandy City is a malfunctioning pump for its water-fluorinated system that released more than 40 times the recommended level of fluoride into water in 2019. It affected 1,500 households, facilities and businesses, and got tired of over 200 people. The investigation showed that the authorities had been waiting for 10 days to inform the public what had happened.
Today, more than 150 US towns or counties have voted to keep fluoride out of public water systems since 2010, according to the Fluoride Action Network.
RFK, Jr. It's because
Like most mainstream groups such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Dental Association, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lorna Koci, chair of the Utah Oral Health Coalition, believes fluoride is the best way to prevent tooth decay on a large scale. She also believes that anti-fluoride momentum has something to do with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the new director of health and welfare.
“I think the anti-fluoride people are latching on Kennedy's opportunity with his beliefs, and now they use it as a way to get into the door to stop the water from freezing,” Kosi told The Associated Press.
Kennedy is not shy about trusting the science of fluoride. He believes that, as research shows, is actually reducing children's IQ. He told the MSNBC Reporter in November:
I think the fluoride is on the way for that court's ruling. The faster it is, the better it is. I'm not going to force anyone to take it out. However, I intend to advise the water district on their liability, legal obligations and services to their members. And I give them good information about science and fluoride.
The history of water fluorination
As of 2020, 72.7% of U.S. local government water systems contained fluoride. In contrast, most Western Europe and Japan do not supply water with fluorescent light.
How did you get here? Rothbird explains:
Fluoride is a by-product of many industrial processes, released in air and water, and perhaps the main source of this by-product is the aluminum industry. By the 1920s and 1930s, fluoride was increasingly under litigation and regulation. …It's time for damage control, or it's time to reverse the public image of this terrifying material. Public Health Services was under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Finance from the 1920s to 1931, with the Secretary of the Treasury being billionaire Andrew J. Mellon, the head of strong mellon's profits and founder and virtual ruler of the Aluminum Corporation (Alcoa), the dominant company in the aluminum industry.
The Mellon Institute, Alcoa's lab in Pittsburgh, sponsored a study in which biochemist Gerald J. Cox fluorinated several laboratory rats and determined that the tooth decay in those rats had been reduced, and quickly concluded that “the case (fluoride reduces cavity) should be considered proven.”
The following year, in 1939, Cox, an Alcoa scientist working for a company suffering from fluoride damage claims, made his first public proposal for forced water fluorination. Cox has cut down on countries that encourage fluorination.
During World War II, claims for fluoride emissions were accumulated as expected, proportionately to the significant expansion of aluminum production during the war. However, attention from these claims was diverted just before the end of the war when PH began to push violently for forced water fluorination. Therefore, the drive of forced fluorination of water achieved two targets in one shot. It transformed the image of fluoride from a curse to a blessing that strengthens the teeth of all children, providing a stable, substantial financial demand that fluoride dumps into the country's water every year.
The fluoride debate remained intense throughout the mid-20th century. TNA's predecessor, American Opinion, featured experts who would not waver if fluorination continued to infect more public water systems. In addition to debates that dispel false medical points, the magazine focused on more important topics.
“(Fluoride) is a socialized medicine in the health field where preventive fluoride is said to be readily available in tablet form,” the American opinion states in the September 1958 issue.
TNA and its parent company, John Birch Society, consistently insisted that the government has no business of mass medication on its citizens, even though benevolent bureaucrats believe they are behaving.
A pioneer into essential “vaccines”?
Decades after the successful fluoride campaign, the government once again bares its tyrannical teeth. After a rushing rollout of the Covid-19 “vaccines,” the Joe Biden administration did everything it could to force people to take shots. All federal employees were forced to choose between JAB or a job. The government extended its duties to contractor employees. Some cities, such as New York City and Los Angeles, have required injections to those who want to participate in society. Anyone who wanted to eat out or watch ball games had to prove their vaccination status. This was textbook tyranny.
Perhaps if Americans had expressed their anger at the massive fluorination, they would not have ended up with the government that sought to jab them with new, unproven technology.