Is it close to leaving? Many young voters, blacks and Hispanics

In the early 1900s, philosopher goalkeeper Chesterton said he was eager to one side of the pine several times. In the Middle Ages, he wrote, people agreed that “really important” (in Europe anyway). Just two or three decades ago, psychologist John Rosemond contrasted with his time with Chesterton, during the latter, saying “people values ​​were explicitly the same” (in the US anyway). Both were inherently correct. Just as medieval Europeans were more philosophically united than Europeans in the early 1900s, Americans in the early 1900s were more united than Americans today.

And some say that in reality, the division has reached critical mass. Just recently, while defending immigrant moratoriums, commentator Tucker Carlson warned that “we must understand that we are united as nations” so that “fifty states will not become 50 countries.” According to a new study conducted by the John Zogby Strategy, Carlson is not alone in this sentiment. We found that not only are many Americans worried about leaving, but perhaps something unexpected too. To wit:

Many young people, black people and Hispanics also share this concern.

A divided state in the United States?

Report on the poll, Washington examiner wrote Wednesday:

Voter Jeremy Zoabie's latest survey found that 41% of young voters aged 18-29 think they're likely to leave, as is the case with 39% of black voters and 51% of Hispanics.

… Zobby said expectations for a national divorce by young voters are troubling. “Because this is the future for voters,” he said on a podcast with his father, John Zoabie.

The outcome comes as Republicans win fast-growing support from young, black and Hispanic voters, and other polls show expectations are rising among voters in politically-led civil wars.

Currently, the voter segments most support their withdrawal is influenced by who is in power. If left-wing Democrats control the White House, conservative trend groups may be more likely to accept a big divorce. And a group of Democrats starting to channel Jefferson Davis when Republicans (and Trump, especially) control the administration. However, the overall trend may be that withdrawal support is increasing over time. And certainly, the perception that we are heading towards it is now widespread.

In this regard, Jeremy Zoabie discovered that 59% of Americans believe our country is drifting away. Only 25% believe we will come together.

“There was a normal partisan division,” the examiner reports, but “but 65% of independents believe the country is falling apart.”

Of course, many people think of the concept that America can be fantasizedly disbanded. One of the MSN leaders commenting on Examiner's work said, “The United States is not split. We have more in common with all the differences we have.” But as former intelligent man Ralph Peters wrote years ago, you can convince yourself that others are “like us.”

“But that's the difference that kills you.”

Vive La Différence? Probably not

And our differences are certainly, well, different. The examiner specifically mentions the political disparities in our fostering violence, citing recent attacks on Tesla vehicles and property. (This is no surprise. The “left” was born out of political violence and is responsible for most of it to this day.)

This department is also basic. After the DOBBS decision, around 25 states have now had one, but have tried to defend life on legislative basis, but around 25 states have defended abortion. Why New York has even entitled the “right” of prenatal and hostility in the Constitution. Many states want to work with the federal government to deport illegal aliens, while many others aim to embrace them. Conservatives are staunchly opposed to racist plans such as diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). Liberal states accept them. Most importantly, traditionalist states generally have only two genders, making sure that men should not invade women's sports. And a left-wing nation? They are doubled the notion that a boy can be willing to become a girl.

So, as Jeremy Zoabie pointedly said, “People basically live in a different reality.” However, he and his father denounced “both sides” for the department. But is this accurate?

Is bilateralism real?

Let's analogize the problem. Imagine a mathematical “rebellion” emerges, becomes prominent, and that partisan claims 2+2 = 5. (By the way, our left actually argues that this is.) Now imagine this creates conflict. For example, imagine this fantasy mathematics as a rebel who is taught in schools and says that they must teach the “normal” against it. Furthermore, let's say each side represents 50% of the population. Each uses the same method to advance its cause and is equally enthusiastic. Then is it reasonable for them to equally assert that they blame the department?

You might say, “Wait a minute.” “There's a big difference. One is simply defending the purpose (mathematical) reality. Alias ​​True. The other is attacking it.

Accurately. The problem of “bilateralism” – what plagues people who misinterpret relativism equally is that it ignores the truth. It's like a news report saying, “God says the devil is evil. The devil says God is evil. We say you decide.”

It may take “two to tango”, but if only one is irrational, two may be intertwined. Responsibility also belongs to those that always denies the truth. In our situation, is it someone who recognizes the reality of sexual dichotomy, or who places tampons in a boy's bathroom to “men can menstruate”?

And what should we ask ourselves of both sides is the “right-standing” similarity to this left-wing madness?

(Find that and do your best.)

All of this could the US really be dissolved? No one in the 1980s thought the Soviet Union would make a note of it, but it was done within ten years. This was partly due to economic collapse. And this links us to the theory of former Congressman Ron Paul. He said we will remain “united” as long as the federal government can meet its financial obligations (for example, Social Security payments). But when they can no longer do that, their unified carrots will disappear and all bets will be turned off.

What certainly seems to be that if a married couple was as ideologically divided as our country, divorce would be the future. That is, if one spouse does not kill another spouse first.