That was a shocking fact. British authorities have ignored child trafficking rings and the beatings, terror and sexual abuse of indigenous British girls for 16 years. It was also for very troubling reasons.
The culprit was a Muslim.
Indeed, one whistleblower was warned not to “mention Asian (Muslim) men[again]” and to raise “awareness of ethnic issues.” Surprisingly, she was even forced to undergo “diversity training.”
That was 11 years ago, when The New American and other sources reported on the scandal. However, the article lacked traction as the politically correct and more powerful mainstream media at the time downplayed it. And some in the British authorities would certainly have been relieved and pleased that it had been a success. That was also the case.
That was until recently, when Elon Musk learned of it and went on an information rampage on the X platform. This is a testament to the power of new media and the importance of Musk's acquisition of X. Because if X were still Twitter and dominated by Twitter tweets, this story would have remained buried.
Government complicit in child rape
For background, here's a quote from the Associated Press that I spoke about in The New American on August 29, 2014.
Around 1,400 children were being sexually exploited in a town in northern England, a report concluded on Tuesday…
The report's author, Alexis Jay, referred to the horrific violence that took place in Rotherham, a town of around 250,000 people, between 1997 and 2013.
…The report describes rapes by multiple perpetrators, primarily from the UK's Pakistani community, and how children were trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England where they were kidnapped, beaten and threatened. did.
Examples of people being doused with petrol and threatened with arson, being threatened with a gun (by the way, what about gun control in the UK?), being forced to witness a brutal rape and being threatened with rape. There is also. Once you tell someone, you're next,” Jay said. “Girls as young as 11 were raped by multiple male perpetrators.''
As already mentioned, the situation was made worse by the casual authorities who ignored the crime for fear of agitating the Muslim community and being labeled as 'racist'.
Indifference enables fraud
But the story didn't end there. Commentator Andrea Widberg reported yesterday:
Over time, it became clear that grooming was not limited to Rotherham. The same pattern was revealed in towns and cities across the UK, although mostly in the north and midlands. Muslims were horribly exploiting non-Muslim British children while the authorities deliberately turned a blind eye.
The past might have remained the past had it not been for Elon Musk who noticed the discussion in X about Muslim immigration to the UK. The debate began by talking about Muslim immigration in general, with the left saying it worked wonderfully and the conservative Sam Bidwell going on to write chapters and verses about the failures of immigration. In that tweet, he said, “There are still dozens of towns that bear the scars of Pakistani grooming gangs that targeted young girls because they were white.”
Unsurprisingly, one leftist asked him to name those “dozens” of towns. Bidwell was required to submit a list of 20 towns (commenters added more), and Elon Musk noted:
Then, on New Year's Day, Musk retweeted the following from journalist Ian Miles Chong: (Thanks to the tweet below and most of the tweets that follow: Andrea Widburg.)
The video above tells the story of an abused girl and how authorities arrested her as the victim rather than her tormentor.
explosion of truth
Now, the hallmark of healthy (virtually uncensored) social media, an information democracy, is the rapid dissemination of large amounts of information about a topic by thousands of citizen journalists. And this must have happened after Musk posted his first tweet about grooming, Widberg said. Suddenly she wrote, he
Tens of millions of people read his tweets about the terror inflicted on Britain's children by Muslim gangs, and about Britain's institutional system, which is covered up and downplayed by everyone in the government, police and media. He caused a stir by retweeting one after another about collusion. what happened.
(Note: Some of the following contains explicit references to sexual abuse.)
“Mr. Musk also retweeted this thread (please read it),” Widberg further wrote. The document provides a “detailed history of rape gangs and systematic cover-ups.”
Technology Playing Cards
Musk then demonstrated why the establishment was trying to destroy him and called for many of its members to be jailed.
So Musk again promoted Britain's anti-establishment Reform UK party, saying:
Musk also took up the cudgel against anti-immigrant activist Tommy Robinson (Tweet below). The British establishment probably hates him more than anyone else on earth.
Robinson isn't alone either. British police are busy arresting elderly people over “unauthorized” internet posts while Islamic gangs attack British women. (The following is an example.)
But is the situation in the UK really that bad? no.
It's worse.
So the UK actually has a 'Secretary for Safeguarding and Violence against Women and Girls'. She also took action.
She blocked a nationwide investigation into the gang.
why? The reason may be that Musk discovered that current British Prime Minister Keir Starmer may have been complicit in the cover-up.
And, given the cover-up, it is perhaps no surprise that the rape gang leaders are still living happily in Britain, according to the following.
I have encountered an enemy and…
Of course, the above speaks for itself. But that's not the case. The real problem, as scary as it is, is far deeper than “just” a rape gang problem. The problem is one of cultural, moral, philosophical, and spiritual corruption, creating a twisted moral compass.
Nothing will change until Brits, and Westerners in general, fear being called enablers of pedophiles rather than “racists”. This distorted sense of virtue manifests itself in many ways.
Think back to the O.J. Simpson trial. And it seemed like several onlookers were more upset that a police officer (Mark Fuhrman) used the n-word than that Simpson had allegedly killed two people. Consider that after a jihadist attack, authorities often seem most concerned that it will provoke “Islamophobia.” Or consider that today people are more tolerant of abortion than they are of cigarette smoke, as GK Chesterton once predicted. (In fact, the new law will eventually ban tobacco completely in the UK, but it will also put government funding into abortions.)
As mentioned above, a sense of virtue is the problem. This is not just a matter of intellectual understanding. For example, virtually everyone will say that rape is worse than so-called hate speech. The question is: what bothers them the most emotionally? What will be their instinctive reaction?
A Nazi concentration camp commander cried when his pet canary died. And too many people today are instinctively more offended by what is politically wrong than what is morally wrong.
And the moral here? If people's internal governance does not change, changes in external governance will end up being mere window dressing.
