U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon informed Harvard University, far away, that he had finished riding the taxpayer's gravy train. Once respected universities no longer receive federal funding.
McMahon told Alan Gerber University that America's campuses won't receive new federal money, citing the rise of hatred on campus, poor financial management and countless plagiarism scandals, McMahon told Alan Gerber University that American campuses won't receive new federal money.
In April, the administration attracted more than $2 billion in federal grants to schools. This was filed for the administration's allegation because it broke the law.
That's doubtful. But even if not, Americans can at least know that in the future they can no longer throw away their hard-earned money at disgraceful colleges.
Plagiarism, teachings of the clowns of democracy on the left, bad financial situation
“Harvard University receives billions of dollars of taxpayers each year, despite a largely accumulated $53.2 billion in tax-free donations (large than 100 countries' GDP) and receiving such taxpayer funds is a privilege, not a right,” writes McMahon. “But instead of using these funds to advance students' education, Harvard is engaged in a systematic pattern of violating federal law.”
The following two statements were non-secret. But that error aside, McMahon's document on Harvard's competition to the bottom of academia revealed a truth that acknowledges most. The only valuable thing about Harvard education is the name of the university on its diploma. Academic standards have fallen sharply.
“Harvard University has laughed at the country's higher education system,” writes McMahon.
It invites foreign students who engage in violent behavior and invite light empt against the United States to its campus. In every respect, Harvard has failed to comply with its legal obligations, ethical and fiduciary duties, transparency, and similarities of academic rigor. Standardized testing requirements and normalized grading systems were discarded. This year, Harvard was forced to adopt an embarrassing “repair mathematics” program for undergraduates. Why does Harvard need to teach simple, basic mathematics when it seems difficult for him to enter this “rave college”? With a good understanding of great grades and the highest level of math, who is in such a low standard when others are rejected?
McMahon again pointed out the plagiarism scandal and “hate discrimination” at the university. Interestingly, she said, “The hiring of Mayors Bill de Blasio and Lori Lightfoot, perhaps the worst mayors to preside over major cities in our country's history, will likely teach “leadership” at the school of public health.
UPSHOT: The university hires left-wing clowns to teach.
McMahon also attacked the university as Penny Pritzker, the principal of the Harvard Corporation's board of directors, runs the board in a “completely confused way” as a “senior fellow.” Pretzker is former President Barack Hussein Obama's Secretary of Commerce. He considers Republicans to be “Nazis.”
“Bill Ackman, a Harvard graduate and highly successful hedge fund manager, noted that under her leadership, Harvard has become a “political advocacy organization for one party,” McMahon wrote.
Ackman called for Pritzker's resignation, concluded that “his mismanagement here is Penny Pritzker,” pointing out that serious companies would have eliminated her after the recent failure of Rittany and the fact that “Harvard is not in good financial position.” According to Ackman, one of the world's most important financial experts, Harvard's so-called $53 billion contribution is “very exaggerated as long as it's truly worth it,” Harvard irresponsibly took away $8 billion in debt.
If this is true, it concerns evidence of Harvard's tragic mismanagement, indicating the urgent need for massive reforms – not ongoing taxpayer investment. If Harvard likes to remain unchanged, then Harvard should be fine with its overflowing donations to fund bloated bureaucracy.
Break the law
But “most surprising,” McMahon writes, by rejecting the fair admissions at Harvard University and the U.S. Supreme Court decisions on Harvard students and fellow students, “continue to engage in ugly racism, both undergraduate and graduate schools, and even the Harvard University review itself.” Harvard argued that it would continue its policy of discrimination based on race, following the court's decision.
Therefore, “Harvard University should not seek federal grants, because nothing is provided,” writes McMahon.
Harvard will no longer be a publicly funded institution and instead operate as an individual-funded institution, and can raise funds from large bases of wealthy alumni based on its enormous contributions. You have a headstart of about $53 billion, much of which was made possible by the fact that you live and benefit from the walls of prosperity secured by the United States and its free market system.
Last month, the Trump administration frozen a $60 million contract with the US$2.2 billion federal fund and universities. This is because it refused to comply with the reforms it requested by the administration. They included the end of Day's employment and employment perspective discrimination. Harvard then sued the administration.
An example of the university refuses to follow normal academic standards, and its own honor code is the ongoing employment of at least three employees after a reliable allegation of plagiarism.
Tuition, rooms and boards for non-financially aid students cost $86,926 a year.
