How something is done is as important as why something is done.
The point suggests that the purpose justifies the means is to launch a moral, ethical, and legal rabbit holes that leave us in totalitarian binding.
We are already on the way.
No matter what, the constitutional framework and protocol (national security, economic crisis, border terrorists, global pandemic, etc.), which have long been useful as our foundation of our republic, are all. The price that is not worth it is the price that we are required to pay -the rule of the law, which is equivalent to the US government's hostile acquisition by the Oli head elite.
This is no longer a conversation on stolen elections, riots, and even deep conditions.
This is a lesson on how fast things will fall apart.
This is a coup of OLI heads that intend to have hostile acquisitions, all years of the double standards of Parchizan and the Constitutional Betrayal and Betrayal of Caution.
It is nothing more than a complete demolition of all the last basic principles of the representative government that answers “our people”.
This shocking electric shock in over -inherited of daily seizures, raids, and presidential instructions, is the government deserving the privacy, privacy, legitimate process, law, freedom of speech, and equality? Depends on whether or not.
I've been claiming the need to re -adjust the government for a long time, but this is not how to proceed.
The problem is whether the behavior of the Trump administration is correct or wrong, but it is terribly wrong and some have been late, but the administrative department has a constitution. Whether you have the power to disable it.
We are as responsible as those who sign a dead warrant for freedom if this coup of the empire is allowed to move forward without pushback or protest.
The power is damaged.
And the absolute force will definitely rot.
However, it requires a nation of a citizen that has been conformed, intentionally ignorant, and politically divided to provide a qualified culture and a dedicated politics.
For a long time, the United States has played politics in that principle, allowing the president and his colleagues to act in violation of the rule of the law.
“Our people” are now paying their prices.
Bush has allowed excessive steps. We all allowed Obama to over -step. We have allowed Trump to overestimate. Biden has allowed him to take it.
These power by the Trump administration have been supported by the Ilon Musk, but it is not excessive.
Everyone is in danger.
If you are supporting the construction of immigration camps in Guantanamo, be careful.
It is not a matter of whether the government will trap Americans due to the obligation, but when.
The politics of the party has no place for what is currently being deployed.
This is what we know. The government has a huge number of prison, detention center, or mobilization, and motivations, muscles, and motives, which resist the order and have been paid for taxpayers, detention centers, and forced camps.
It's a matter of time.
What is the hot button problem? Whether it is no longer a problem. hammer.
The foundation is already laid.
Under the indefinite clause on the National Defense Avision Law (NDAA), the President and the army believe that the government is terrorist, and will detain and impose American citizens who cannot access their friends, family, or court. You can do it.
So it's not surprising that you can label you as a terrorist just by criticizing the government.
After all, considering that the government prefers to use the word “anti -government”, “extremist”, and “terrorists”, it is no longer necessary to be considered terrorists.
This not only has the authority to decide the potential dangerous person of government agencies, courts, and police, but also gives the institution to confine the individual for mistaken mistakes. Sometimes it happens.
It is a system that pleads to be abused by bureaucrats who are hungry for desperate power to maintain their power at all sacrifice.
It happened before.
As the history shows, the US government does not hate locking citizens for its own purpose.
The federal government must return to the 1940s, where the federal government, who has been labeled with a potential anti -registration, can be placed in a camp, based on the origin of the ethnic group. To maintain “order” in your hometown to see the length of the federal government.
The US Supreme Court examined the Colematsu -to -US (1944) detention program and concluded that the national safety has the need for a government to secure individual freedom.
Although Kolematsu's decision was never officially overturned, Roberts said in Trump vs. Hawaii (2018), “The forced relocation of US citizens to concentration camps is based on races. Objective, objective, presidential.
Roberts's statement rarely provides safety guarantees in light of the government's tendency to avoid the rule of law if it meets the purpose. It is pointed out that such a blatant detention may occur again -there is a court blessing -the justice warned that “the law is silent in the age of war.”
As I pointed out in my book “Battlefield America: The War for the American People”, it seems that it is completely a circle in many aspects in the fictional counter part, Erik Blair Diaries. 。
Twenty years ago, we believed that we were discussing non -citizens (for example, so -called enemy combatants were discussing whether Guantanamo Bay and Muslim Americans were concluded on 9/11). I was. They are related to indefinite detention.
Americans were not overly worried about the rights of non -citizens, and they still don't seem to be so interested. Nevertheless, in the near future, we can be in an enviable position to target indefinite detention by our government.
About John & Nisha White Head:
The constitutional lawyer and author, John W. Whitehead, is the founder and chairman of the Lasford Research Institute. His latest book The ERIK BLAIR DIARIES and BATTLEFIELD America: The War on the American People is available on www.amazon.com. The white head can be contacted by (e -mail protection). Nisha White Head is an executive director of the Lasford Research Institute. Information about Lazaford Institute is available in www.ratherford.org.