Dems' miserable refusal to divorce “trans” lobby

Assuming that when the history of our time is finally written, there are people who write it (AI?), we can imagine how historians interpret the Democrats' obsession with the pseudo-sex switch.

“They believe that boys can become girls just by wanting it, and they persecuted people who deviate from this orthodox.”

“That's why the Democrats died.”

Depending on your perspective, it is a vision of a future that is very optimistic or very pessimistic. But that's also what many say is why Democrats lost the 2024 election. After all, the agenda of Muss (constituted sexual situations, aka “transgender”) is the most bizarre cause.

And Democrats seemingly married to it with devotion that “plays our role until we die.”

Mass arabatros

With this in mind, commentator Ned Cosby wrote on Wednesday that Democrats have a “transgender albatross issue.” Quoting Kamala Harris as an example, he claims the issue “sinks” her, “continuing to sink the Democrats.” He then reminded me of Donald Trump's campaign.

The team used archival footage of the extremist leftist VP for interviews with men who took on a female attitude.

In an interview, Harris allegedly endorsed a taxpayer-funded sex change business for California prisoners who wanted such a procedure. Trump's campaign created a 30-second ad that Harris would pay taxpayers to pay for “sex change” surgery for California inmates who want Harris to physically appear as a woman.

Cosby then continued:

The widely monitored ads split the Democratic coalition of voters and independent voters. (Slightly free) charlamagne tha god… blamed the idea that taxpayers would pay for such an outrageous surgical procedure. Just recently, a federal district judge ordered the Indiana prison system to provide “transsexual” surgery to the man who murdered the baby.

Also related to this is a bill just passed by the Colorado House Democrats. Outrageously, it would allow the government to grab the child from parents who refuse to “affirm” their child's muss' delusions in their custody decisions. These stories and others like them conclude that this is willing to die for the Democrats of the Hill. But is this really true? (Like water, politicians are ultimately taking the form of a ship where they find themselves.)

And if they keep up with it, will they die from it?

Confused masses

It may not be a mystery why it is to save California Gov. Gavin Newsom and continue to embrace Democrats' agenda thoroughly. A 2023 survey by the Institute of Public Religion found that only 44% of Democrats thought they had “two genders.” (The appropriate word is “sex.”) No, this doesn't necessarily mean that 56% support extreme Musa positions, such as placing boys in girls' locker rooms. But consider that a few democratic activists and voters are not radical sexual delegates. Also, consider that many Democrats or most Democrats are clearly confused about human sexual binaries. What will it all be?

A “moderate Democrat” will not have the passion and will to shake up extremists.

Of course, it should be noted that President Trump won a small number of swing states with less than 2% of the vote. It is reasonable and concludes that voters' dislike for Democrats' mouse trespassing could explain this difference. Still, beware of something else:

If votes had been slightly different in these states, Trump would have lost.

Also, there are many factors that occur in elections, so other factors could also account for more than 2% of the vote. For example, imagine Democrats nominated an effective candidate rather than Kamala “ward salad” Harris. Did they beat the White House despite their Massachusetts plot? That's a calm idea.

Understand that states such as California, Colorado, New York and Illinois also march on Muss' agenda with at least implicit voter approval.

Many would say there was an anti-mass pushback in conservative states and nationwide. But is that rationale really encouraging?

perspective

Think about it: Muss' agenda hurts millions of children physically and/or psychologically. For example, unfortunate teens such as Nathaniel, Milo (the source of the last name), and Chloe Cole had irreversible physical resection. We also hear about a cluster of girls from the same school who are in a “gender” clinic in search of MUS sexual distortion treatment. (Clearly a social work issue.) And millions of other children are confused about sexual binaries, the basic reality and division of nature.

And for the shameful thing, we adults allowed this to happen.

What's more, what is the “big pushback” now?

The frustration of girls losing boys' sports opportunities. In fact, this is practically the only thing in always “conservative” anti-mass laws.

Now, some perspectives. Imagine your young son doesn't want to participate in lacrosse. After that, you learn the tragic reason: his coach sexually abused him.

Your only obvious concern is that your boy has missed out on sports opportunities?

After all, track and field is frivolous. And the only reason Muss' agenda lost this one fight is that it hit another leftist agenda, the feminist agenda, and that one fight is so impressive and awful.

There is a reason why director Mel Gibson cleverly portrayed Satan in androzin (i.e., Masa, in 2004's Passion of Christ. (Video below.) Sexual binaries are not only a fundamental division of nature, but are often considered to be ordained by God.

The main reason to oppose evil is because it is evil. The main reason we support and defend the truth is that it is the truth. Until we apply this to the Muss agenda, it will become an albatross around the neck of our civilization. But hey, I think at least we can still play ball.