On the second day of the Trump administration, 22 states and Washington, DC sued the newly established president in federal court to block an executive order that would end his natural citizenship.
The law is not surprising. But now, the Heritage Foundation's oversight project has led to a conspiracy that state and Washington, D.C., to file a lawsuit just days after President Donald Trump defeated Vice President Kamala Harris. I discovered it.
The project publishes written agreements between states that govern how litigation is approached.
The Blue State lawsuit was the second lawsuit filed to stop Trump from properly applying the 14th amendment to the federal constitution. The American Civil Liberties Union, designed for Communists, sued Trump on his inauguration.
Presidential Order
Trump fired the first shot in a legal war when he signed his executive order “protecting the meaning and value of American citizenship.”
“The privilege of US citizenship is a valuable and profound gift,” Trump wrote, citing the 14th Amendment. The state they live in. ”
Noting that the clause protected the birthright citizenship of freed slaves, the order explained that it was not intended to grant citizenship to illegal alien children.
However, the amendment to Section 14 has never been interpreted as a universal extension of citizenship to all born within the United States. Amendments to Article 14 are always excluded from birthright citizenship that was born in the United States but not “the subject of its jurisdiction.” Consistent with this understanding, Congress furthermore, through the Act that he is “a person born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction” and is a national and citizen of the United States at birth, 8 USC 1401. It was designated through the law that it reflects an amendment to Article 14. Text.
Among those who are not subject to that jurisdiction within the category of individuals born in the United States, the privilege of US citizenship does not automatically extend to those born in the United States. (1) when the person's mother illegally attends the United States, and the father may be a US citizen or a legal permanent resident at the time of the person's birth, or (2) the person's person's birth in the United States The mother's presence was legal, but only temporary, but not limited to, on visiting the United States under the auspices of a visa waiver program, or on a student, work or tourist visa visit. and the father was not a US citizen or a legal permanent resident at the time of the person's birth.
Litigation
On January 20, the ACLU sued in U.S. District Court in New Hampshire, claiming that the order violated the 14th Amendment.
“The citizenship clause is fundamental common law rule by citizenship enshrited by the constitution, and that is why all people born in the United States are citizens,” the anti-American legal costume argued.
The term “jurisdictional subject” excludes only a few applicable categories. Today, only children of diplomatic diplomats. All other children born in the United States are citizens regardless of their parents' immigrant status.
The executive order violates the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, in order to deny the citizenship of non-citizen children born in the United States and subject to US jurisdiction.
The 17-page lawsuit also alleges that Trump violated the very law he cited to revoke birthright citizenship, 8 USC 1401, and that he also violated the Administrative Procedure Act by exceeding his power. He insisted.
After that, 23 distant lawyer generals came. They argued roughly the same in the U.S. District Court in Seattle. In other words, anyone born in the United States is subject to that jurisdiction, and regardless of that, the citizenship of their mother is the subject of their own mother.
Judge Joseph Laplante, appointed by President George W. Bush yesterday, sided with the ACLU on the left and maintained Trump's orders.
Last week in Maryland, Judge Deborah Boardman, appointed by President Joe Biden, maintained Trump's order with a nationwide injunction.
In the Seattle case, Judge John C. Cornor, appointed by President Ronald Reagan, also continued his order. He wrote that birthright citizenship is “a clear constitutional right.”
The judge blocked the order on the grounds that when the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit they would win in their case.
This issue could be heading towards the US Supreme Court.
National conspiracy
The state and DC's nationwide attacks began with a “privileged and confidential common interest agreement” that does not mention birthright citizenship.
But it is clearly an agreement that launched the law. All the hatred Trump Attorney General signed it.
“Despite the orders from Americans to end the border crisis and return immigration enforcement to the United States, politicians instead acted to desperately preserve their perceived political interests of the Biden border crisis. ”, the surveillance project wrote to X.
Their top priority is not gas, groceries, public safety or concerns of citizen members, but ensuring that future children of illegal aliens who entered during the Biden border crisis will become voters. It was a raw political calculation to do so. .
Instead of trying to get American voters back, they are trying to create American voters and replace them with the back of the worst border crisis in American history.
The fraudulent status and signatories participating are:
Arizona: Daniel Barr California: Rob BontaColorado: Natalie Hanlon Leh Connecticut: William Ton Delaware: Kathleen Jennings Hawaii: Anne Lopez Illinois: Brent Stratton Maine: Aaron Frey・Maryland: Anthony Brown Massachusetts: Abigail Taylor Michigan Michigan Minigan: Aaron FordNew Jersey: Angelakai New Mexico: Raul Torres New York: Letitia James North Carolina: Daniel MosterrOregon: Ellen RosenblumRhode Island : Peter Neron Havermont: Charity Clark Washington DC: Brian Schwarb Washington
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
English
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish