I, how things have changed. The US president considers Ukrainian leader Voldimia Zelensky to be the dictator, and Ukrainian leaders believe the president lives in a “space of disinformation.”
Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, White House Messaging has consistently broadcast paintings of Ukrainian binary stories as perfectly good and very bad. But there is a new sheriff in town. Like many others, President Donald Trump has either turned American foreign policy into his head, or at least lateralized.
Dictator Zelensky?
The reason Trump called Zelensky a dictator is because he refuses to hold the election. The president released a tough social media post early on Wednesday.
Zelenskyy admits that half of the money we sent him is “missing.” He refused to vote, and was very low in Ukrainian polls, and all he was good at was playing Biden “like the fiddle.” The unelected dictator, Zelenskyy, is better to move faster, or he will not leave the country.
Ukraine cited the war and canceled the election before they were due to happen in the spring of 2024. Trump stressed at a press conference from Mar-a-Lago on Tuesday that if Ukraine wants to sit at the negotiation table with Russia, which he has never seen before, it would be better to hold the election. Interestingly, as one reporter pointed out, Russia is not a heaven for “democracy” and free elections either. However, Russian President Vladimir Putin has not received billions of dollars in US taxpayer money. Being a dictator is not an obstacle to foreign aid in the United States.
Trump also explained why European leaders have not received invitations to the negotiation table. They have had seats for three years and have not solved anything, he said, adding, “The half-baked negotiators were able to settle down earlier this year.”
As for the lost money Trump mentioned in his social media post, he may be talking about the February 2nd interview. Meanwhile, Zelensky said Ukraine had only received about $75 million in arms, training, transportation and humanitarian aid. Regarding someone who says Ukraine received $200 billion, he said, “This is not true. I don't know where this money is.”
General Keith Kellogg, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, worked on this a few days after Zelensky's comments. He said:
The United States, American citizens and citizens have given Ukraine more than $174 billion. And we put the general on the ground on the ground in Ukraine to track that money, so we have a pretty good accounting of where it is heading. …Some of that money allowed was actually spent here in America to build the weapons systems we're sending there. So, if he thinks more than $174 billion is sitting on the ground of a Ukrainian bank, of course… we're going to accumulate stocks.
According to the US government:
As of September 30, 2024, Ukraine's total response funds for the US Ukraine were approximately $183 billion, with a $1300.1 billion obligation and $86.7 billion payments.
NATO Expansion – Is Russia telling the truth? …
On Tuesday, US and Russian officials met in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and agreed to appoint a team to negotiate a peace deal and end the war. The meeting concluded a three-year US policy focusing on Moscow's quarantine. Relationships between national leaders have been warming ever since. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said both sides agreed not only to tackle peace reconciliation, but also to explore “the incredible opportunities that exist to partner with the Russians.” Putin said on his part that the discussion was “friendly.” And perhaps most importantly, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Trump had said, “The first and so far, in my opinion, that one of the underlying causes of the situation in Ukraine is pure line. He said he was the only Western leader to speak out loud. The government before he pulled Ukraine into NATO. “He added, “It signaled that he understands our position.” Ta.
The Russian point that Ukrainian invitation to NATO served as a legitimate provocation to invasion lies at the heart of the responsibility game. Former acting President Joe Biden has repeatedly called the Russian invasion “unprovoked.” This was also a general topical point parrotled throughout mainstream western media since the start of the war. Russians say Ukraine's invitation to NATO threatens their national security and breaks promises that Russian leaders received from Western leaders decades ago shortly after the official collapse of the Soviet Union . Putin said in the early 1990s that if Germany was allowed to reunify within NATO, NATO agreed not to expand “a inch to the east.” And now the President of the United States has sympathy for this. Trump said at a press conference on January 7th:
The majority of the problem is that Russia said for years, long before Putin, “we will never have NATO involved in Ukraine.” Now they said that. It's like written in stone. And somewhere along the line, Biden said, “No. They should be able to join NATO.” Well, Russia has someone on their gateway, and I'm saying they're about it. I was able to understand the feelings of
…Yes, that's right
Declassified documents stored in George Washington University's National Security Archives show that Russian officials are likely to be telling the truth. According to the summary:
NATO's famous “1 inch East” guarantee at a meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was announced on February 9, 1990 that NATO's famous “1 inch East” guarantee. “To” guarantee was part of the cascade of Soviet security given to Golbachev and other Soviets by Western leaders. According to Soviet, German, British and French documents, he was an official until 1991 through the process of German unification in 1990.
US officials also said that Russia will be included in the future European Security Alliance, and Russia will be included in the future European Security Alliance, according to declassified documents. This confirms what Putin said to Tucker Carlson a year ago during a controversial interview in Moscow.
The confidential documents are also shown to British officials who agree that there should be a guarantee that Russians will not join NATO in Poland. Poland joined in 1999, and later joined several countries in Central and Eastern Europe as well. Currently, 32 countries are part of the alliance, with 16 of them joining after the end of the Cold War, some of which are well beyond Germany's central point.
This does not completely exempt Russians from taking responsibility. From a fair and isolated perspective, sovereign states are free to alliance with their chosen ones without being invaded. But it is a theoretical perspective of a practical world that constitutes very different dynamics.
Negotiation goals
Unlike Biden and the warm European leaders, Trump wants to end the human massacre and prevent the nuclear world war. “People are dying,” he repeatedly said. The Biden administration's response to Putin's repeated threats of nuclear escalation was to dismiss them as nothing more than empty bluffs.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegses told NATO officials on February 13 that the goal of the negotiations was “the end of the diplomatic peace of this war as soon as possible in a way that creates lasting and durable peace.” He spoke.
The globalists of the Council of Foreign Relations now acknowledge what we all know, but this is never said in mainstream media. Russia is winning the war. Nevertheless, the CFR, representing the globalist attitude, is not a peace but a strategy that involves NATO countries increasing military cooperation and continuing the war until “Russia has fewer benefits in continuing the fight.” I'm defending.
Is the US leaving Europe?
During his Mar-a-lago press conference, Trump submitted questions about the future of Europe's security and the role of America within it.
He told reporters that there is no problem with Europeans who have “peacekeeping forces” in Ukraine. “That means we don't need to do,” he said. European leaders have already shown their plans to do just that. Earlier this month, British Prime Minister Kiel Starmer said that if there is a contract to end the war with Russia, British troops are ready to be placed on Ukraine's ground. The Guardian reported on February 16th.
Mainstream media speculations include the story of Trump's foreign policy ending NATO. But Trump and the people in his administration have shown nothing like that. When asked if he was considering removing all US troops from Europe, Trump said no. Hegseth told the same NATO officials that America is committed to building a stronger “more deadly NATO.” He called NATO “the most successful defence alliance in history” and said it was time to “make NATO great again.” But he showed that the US doesn't exist in the region as before, and that it's time for Europe to throw more money.
Our European allies should be responsible for the defence of the continent. This means the ownership of security by all allies, led by a clear understanding of strategic reality. And it starts with an increase in defence spending. As the president said, 2% is a start, but that's not enough, neither 3% nor 4%. It's similar to 5%. A real investment. True urgency.
The stupidity of NATO membership
It's a shame the Trump administration doesn't see the stupidity of NATO membership. The John Birch Association, the parent company of the magazine, has always advocated for the United States to abandon globalist organizations. They continue to do so. NATO membership increases the likelihood that America will be drawn into war. If a member of NATO goes to war, all member states must participate. However, without NATO, there could be a war between the region, the countries involved and allies.
Furthermore, the NATO Alliance serves as an excuse to sink every country into a world order of one world. In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, policy expert and Columbia Professor Jeffrey Sachs has been involved in numerous “stabilization” plans in Europe, but the Western goal with NATO is to say that It was about taking over the whole world like a game.” risk”:
It was a game. They thought they would win the game. …The “risk” game was a big game for me. You wanted your work in every part of the world map. That was the game. When you took over the whole world, the world hegemony we are calling it now, you won. They're playing that game.
